Computational Neuroscience Scholar Analysis

Comprehensive analysis of top researchers in computational neuroscience, including citation metrics, h-index distribution, institutional affiliations, and research categories.

Data Source: OpenAlex API185 Scholars Analyzed

Overview Statistics

Total Scholars

185

In computational neuroscience

👨‍🔬

Avg Citations

38,990

Median: 24,517

📚

Avg H-index

53.4

Max: 259

📊

Avg Publications

286

Median: 156

📝

Distribution Analysis

Citation Count Distribution

H-index Distribution

Citations vs H-index

Relationship between H-index and Total Citations (by Category)

Geographic & Institutional Distribution

Distribution by Country

Top Institutions

Research Category Distribution

Research Categories

Category Breakdown

Computational Neuroscience113 Scholars (61.1%)
AI & Machine Learning34 Scholars (18.4%)
Visual Neuroscience13 Scholars (7.0%)
Cognitive Neuroscience11 Scholars (5.9%)
Network Neuroscience7 Scholars (3.8%)
Motor Control7 Scholars (3.8%)

Key Insights

🎯

Citation Power Law

Citations follow a strong power law distribution. The top 10% of scholars account for citations above 87,112, while the median is only 24,517.

🌍

Geographic Concentration

The field is heavily concentrated in North America and Western Europe, with the US accounting for 36 scholars (19% of the sample).

🔬

Interdisciplinary Nature

Many top scholars bridge AI/ML and neuroscience. The highest-cited researchers often develop widely-used methods or theoretical frameworks that cross disciplines.

🏆

Early Career Impact Rankings

Ranking scholars by their citation impact during the first 5 years of their academic careers. This metric reveals early academic "explosion" potential and foundational contributions.

Top Early Citations

6,724

David Marr

Average Early Citations

2,137

Median Early Citations

1,595

Scholars Analyzed

20

Key Findings

1

David Marr's Legacy

David Marr leads with 6,724 early citations. His 1969-1973 works, especially 'A theory of cerebellar cortex', defined computational neuroscience's foundations.

Single paper: 3,291 citations

2

Early Burst Pattern

9 scholars have >20% of total citations from their first 5 years, indicating strong early-career impact in this field.

Average early citations: 2,137

3

Modern Rising Stars

7 scholars starting after 2005 made the top 20, showing the field's continued growth and new talent emergence.

Gershman, Scellier, Zenke lead the new generation

4

Sustained vs. Early Impact

Compare Warland (100% early) vs Paninski (7.5% early): some scholars peak early, others build influence over decades.

3 pre-1990 scholars still influential

Top 15 by Early Career Citations

Early Impact Pattern Analysis

The "Marr Effect"

David Marr's early works accumulated 6,724 citations in just 5 years (1969-1973), representing 23.2% of his total career citations. His theoretical frameworks became foundational texts cited for decades.

One-Hit Wonders vs. Sustained Growth

Davd Warland's single paper "Spikes" accounts for 100% of citations, while Liam Paninski's early 7.5% suggests continuous career growth. Both are valid paths to impact.

Modern AI-Neuro Crossover

Benjamin Scellier (2016 start) achieved 1,591 early citations largely from "A deep learning framework for neuroscience" - showing the field's growing intersection with AI.

Methodological Impact

Method developers like Paninski ("Instant neural control") often have lower early % because their tools gain adoption gradually over time.

Complete Early Career Rankings (Top 20)

#ScholarInstitutionCareer StartEarly CitationsEarly %Papers
1David Marr
A theory of cerebellar cortex
Massachusetts Institute of Technology1969-19736,72423.2%8
2Sander Nieuwenhuis
Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task
Leiden University1999-20034,44618.6%16
3Samuel J. Gershman
Model-Based Influences on Humans' Choices and Striatal Prediction Errors
Harvard University2007-20113,74618.5%16
4Michael Breakspear
Synchronous Gamma activity: a review and contribution to an integrative neuroscience model
Hunter Medical Research Institute2001-20053,0449.5%25
5Davd Warland
Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code
Harvard University1996-20002,886100%1
6Richard Miles
Excitatory synaptic interactions between CA3 neurones in the guinea-pig hippocampus
Collège de France1983-19872,59117.2%18
7Panayiota Poirazi
Pyramidal Neuron as Two-Layer Neural Network
FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology1999-20031,89022.5%6
8Liam Paninski
Instant neural control of a movement signal
Columbia University Irving Medical Center1998-20021,6837.5%5
9Jeffrey M. Beck
Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes
Duke University2003-20071,65229.4%7
10David G. Beiser
Models of Information Processing in the Basal Ganglia
University of Chicago1994-19981,59943.2%16
11Benjamin Scellier
A deep learning framework for neuroscience
Independent2016-20201,59196.9%16
12Adam Marblestone
Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno
Massachusetts Institute of Technology2009-20131,54627.1%12
13Anna C. Schapiro
Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure
California University of Pennsylvania2009-20131,44825.9%11
14Eric Horvitz
Decision theory in expert systems and artificial intelligence
Microsoft (United States)1984-19881,2083%14
15Viktor Jirsa
Field Theory of Electromagnetic Brain Activity
Inserm1994-19981,1974.7%9
16Claudia Clopath
Connectivity reflects coding: a model of voltage-based STDP with homeostasis
Imperial College London2006-20101,1887.9%8
17Archy O. de Berker
Computations of uncertainty mediate acute stress responses in humans
Independent2013-20171,13642.5%13
18Wulfram Gerstner
Why spikes? Hebbian learning and retrieval of time-resolved excitation patterns
EPFL1990-19941,1303.5%18
19Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory
Brain (Germany)2001-20051,0733.5%8
20Friedemann Zenke
Inhibitory Plasticity Balances Excitation and Inhibition
Friedrich Miescher Institute2008-201295313.5%5
🌟

Rising Stars: Youngest Scholars

The 10 youngest computational neuroscientists by academic career start date. These emerging researchers represent the future of the field.

🌟

Youngest Scholar

Scellier

Started in 2016, only 9 years in academia

🚀

Most Efficient

Gershman

1127 citations/year average

📊

Average Stats

15 years

Avg age with 5,105 avg citations

🎯

AI-Neuro Focus

70%

of young scholars work on AI + neuroscience intersection

Citations per Academic Year

Measuring research efficiency: total citations divided by years in academia

Academic Age vs H-Index

Bubble size represents total citations

Key Findings: The New Generation

Samuel Gershman Leads Efficiency

With 1,127 citations per year, Gershman demonstrates exceptional research productivity. His work on computational cognitive science has rapidly gained influence.

AI-Neuro Convergence

70% of the youngest scholars focus on the intersection of AI and neuroscience, including Scellier (equilibrium propagation), Zenke (spiking networks), and Marblestone (neural engineering).

Rapid H-Index Growth

Gershman achieved H-index 71 in just 18 years, while Schapiro and Zenke both reached 27 in under 17 years - indicating accelerating impact in modern academia.

Institutional Diversity

Young scholars are distributed across top institutions: Harvard, MIT, NYU, Imperial College, and research institutes like Friedrich Miescher - showing field-wide talent development.

Complete Youngest Scholars Rankings

#ScholarInstitutionFirst PubAgeCitationsH-IndexCites/Year
1Benjamin Scellier
A deep learning framework for neuroscience
Independent20169 yrs1,6429182
2Grace W. Lindsay
Parallel processing by cortical inhibition enables context-dependent behavior
New York University201411 yrs2,93013266
3Archy O. de Berker
Computations of uncertainty mediate acute stress responses in humans
Independent201312 yrs2,67216223
4Garrett B. Goh
Constant pH molecular dynamics of proteins
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory201015 yrs2,04218136
5João Sacramento
Dendritic cortical microcircuits
ETH Zurich201015 yrs1,66515111
6Adam Marblestone
Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno
Massachusetts Institute of Technology200916 yrs5,71224357
7Anna C. Schapiro
Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure
University of Pennsylvania200916 yrs5,59427350
8Friedemann Zenke
Inhibitory Plasticity Balances Excitation and Inhibition
Friedrich Miescher Institute200817 yrs7,03527414
9Colleen J. Gillon
Learning from unexpected events in the neocortical microcircuit
Imperial College London200817 yrs1,472887
10Samuel J. Gershman
Model-Based Influences on Humans' Choices and Striatal Prediction Errors
Harvard University200718 yrs20,281711127
📊

Multi-Metric Ranking Matrix

Compare scholars across all metrics simultaneously. Each cell shows the scholar's rank for that specific metric. Hover over names for detailed profiles.

Scholar Ranking Matrix

Multi-dimensional evaluation of 185 scholars. Hover over names for details, click headers to sort.

Current weights:Balanced evaluation of historical contributions and current activity
Rank colors:Top 5%Top 10%Top 25%Top 50%Bottom 50%Importance: *Primary +Secondary -Auxiliary
ScholarOverallv
* H-Index
* 2Yr
* Eff
* M-Idx
+ Citations
- Pubs
- i10
1235-122
27176-131513
312116-302214
442211-553
531919-934
612815-211
762114-876
83823-254938
91612372512115
1083333-2399
1127812-734633
1253938-1967
13181125-803728
14261513-624236
1515460747128
16144328-391718
17132370-4085
182534303662932
192436511652020
20114558-421112
21174029-893926
22221866-1001817
231926744881416
2445259-916556
25214932-692827
2628204861043224
2796456-371011
282037509601919
2910958-2225112
30233055-1012623
31351354-1263629
3229987-1241310
33331622131286143
3465521-1488067
35312483-1251621
3649274181083542
37584118-1094750
38304795596435
39463844-1304547
40432967-1354041
41445326-1336460
42346553-942422
43474634-1345853
44601472-1515661
45326768-1273131
46366271-1293034
4776743121567778
4892640-1729191
49593576-1545357
50831061-1708583
Showing 50 / 185 scholars | M-Index data: 20 | Click headers to sort

Full Scholar Directory

Scholar Directory

RankName Citations H-Index Publications Institution Category
1479,5051871290Centre Universitaire de MilaComputational Neuroscience
2296,1232592051King's College LondonComputational Neuroscience
3263,90500WIN (FMRIB)Network Neuroscience
4224,51900PresidentComputational Neuroscience
5187,3811531002Francis Crick ProfessorComputational Neuroscience
6175,31400Principal Scientist and DirectorAI & Machine Learning
7172,21700TU Berlin & Korea University & Google DeepMindAI & Machine Learning
8139,379114932MITComputational Neuroscience
9137,7831601100Ohio Northern UniversityAI & Machine Learning
10132,78800Professor of Neural ScienceVisual Neuroscience
11128,89300Professor of Computational NeuroscienceComputational Neuroscience
12126,13800Oxford Centre for Computational NeuroscienceVisual Neuroscience
13125,492112501Distinguished ProfessorComputational Neuroscience
14106,29100Professor of PsychiatryCognitive Neuroscience
15102,04900Columbia UniversityComputational Neuroscience
16101,16300Google DeepMindAI & Machine Learning
1789,14300Wang ProfessorCognitive Neuroscience
1888,36400DirectorAI & Machine Learning
1987,112117998Max Planck Institute for Biological CyberneticsComputational Neuroscience
2082,31300MITMotor Control
Showing 1 to 20 of 185 Scholars
Page 1 of 10

Methodology & Data Notes

Data Source

Scholar data retrieved from OpenAlex API, filtering by the Computational Neuroscience concept (ID: C15286952). Data includes citation counts, h-index, publication counts, and institutional affiliations.

Caveats

  • Cross-disciplinary researchers may have inflated metrics
  • Tool/method developers typically have higher citation counts
  • H-index varies significantly across sub-fields
  • Academic age is not factored into raw metrics